Lesson 8 Introduction to Performance-Based Assessment
According to Zimmaro (2003), performance-based assessment is a direct and systematic observation of the actual performance of students based on a predetermined performance criteria. Performance-based assessment is sometimes called as authentic or alternative assessment. Performance assessment implies that students need to demonstrate a particular skill in an actual performance. Authentic assessment means that a teacher must use a realistic situation in the testing material. Meanwhile, alternative assessment means a different assessment method against the conventional or traditional assessment methods that are limited pen-and-paper tests.
A. Features of Performance-Based Assessment
Gronlund (1998) and Popham (2011) identify the following features which clearly described a performance assessment. Those are:
- Realistic task.
- Task complexity.
- Greater time needed.
- Multiple evaluation criteria and pre-specified quality standard.
- Judgmental appraisal
B. Types of Performance Task
Performance-based assessment focus on the final output that must be developed or process to be demonstrated. Below are some performance-based assessment task according to Musial (2009):
- Solving a problem.
- Completing an inquiry.
- Determining a position.
- Task Demonstration.
- Developing Exhibits.
- Task Presentation.
- Capstone Performances.
C. Advantages and Disadvantages of Performance-Based Assessments
The following are the benefits performance-based assessment offers:
- Assess complex learning outcomes not measured by pen-and-paper tests
- Assess both process and product
- Communicate instructional goals that relate to real world context
- Involve the students in the process of assessing their own growth
- Recognize that students can express what they know and can do in different ways
- Enhance the professional skills of teachers through collaboration with other teachers
- Engage students and boost their interest and motivation
Below on the other hand are the limitations of performance-based assessments:
- Time consuming both in constructing, administrating and assessing
- Subjectivity of scoring
- Discouraging to less abled students
References:
- Balagtas, M. et al. (2020). Assessment in Learning 2. Quezon City, Philippines: Rex Book Store, Inc.
- Cajigal, R. & Mantuano, M. L. (2014). Assessment of Learning 2. Quezon City, Philippines: Adriana Publishing Co., Inc.
- Corpuz, B. & Cuartel, I. (2021). Assessment in Learning 2: Authentic Assessment. Quezon City, Philippines: Lorimar Publishing, Inc.
- CMO No. 75 s. 2017, Policies, Standards and Guidelines for Bachelor of Secondary Education (BSEd), p. 40
- CMO No. 80 s. 2017, Policies, Standards and Guidelines for Bachelor of Physical Education (BPEd), p. 25
- De Guzman-Santos, R. (2007). Advanced Methods in Educational Assessment and Evaluation. Assessment of Learning 2. Quezon City, Philippines: Lorimar Publishing, Inc.
- Gabuyo, Y. & Dy, G. (2013). Assessment of Learning II. Quezon City, Philippines: Rex Book Store, Inc.
- Garcia, C. (2008). Measuring and Evaluating Learning Outcomes: A Textbook in Assessment of Learning 1 & 2Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Books Atbp. Publishing Corp.
Comments
Post a Comment